04 Feb 2010
Sample Essay: The Grand Inquisitor
The Grand Inquisitor is one of the best novels written with a perceptive piece of theology. The novel grasps the perversion of Christianity and Christian churches about the mystery, miracle, and temptation of Christ in the wilderness. It demonstrates how Jesus rejected different temptations, and how men rejoiced and followed him like sheep.
The Grand Inquisitor
In the life of Jesus Christ, he performs number of miracles that made people believe in him. He was arrested by the inquisition and was sentenced to be burned on the following day. The Grand Inquisitor visited Christ in his cell and he was convinced that this person is in fact the Christ who returned to earth. The inquisitor himself points out in favor for the freedom of Christ and he justifies that condemnation made against Jesus. In one of the passages, it was mentioned that Christ appeared quietly and inconspicuously that other people even recognized him. In the event, people followed him and it seems that there is an invincible force that drives them to follow like the sheep. The people surrounded Jesus and they flocked around him, while Jesus passes with a quiet smile and full of compassion. After all the miracles of Jesus, he was arrested by the Grand Inquisitor and the latter made some complaints against the freedom that Jesus offered to him. For the Grand Inquisitor, he considered the actions of Jesus as an innate lawlessness because he returned into the world, empty handed, and with some promise of freedom. The Grand Inquisitor believed that the people are weak and eternally depraved, and they do not want freedom. He emphasized how Jesus was tempted in the wilderness, and was strong enough to handle freedom and rejected the offer of the devil. The actions demonstrated by Jesus against all the temptation are enormous that people cannot just handle. Tens of millions of people followed Jesus, and apparently these people are not strong to reject temptations for the sake for heavenly cause (Freedom, 2009).
In the novel, the Grand Inquisitor gave greater emphasis on the three temptations that Christ faced in the wilderness. It was illustrated in the novel how Jesus rejected all the offers of evil demonstrating to the people his mighty powers. The Grand Inquisitor believes that the things which Jesus rejects in the wilderness are the things that people cannot reject. However, there are some people who can ignore those things but the great masses are weak to reject them. There is a claim that majority of the people need these material things in order to be happy. The novel pointed out that people has a conscience and moral sense that they are willing to give their full respect to those who can give them bread. The people have the tendency to follow those who seduced their conscience.
The Grand Inquisitor emphasized that people are indeed not capable of handling absolute freedom. The Grand Inquisitor insisted that freedom and law certainly will come into conflict. Just like how the people followed Jesus, their conscience was captivated and during that time the people were given the freedom to decide of what is good and evil. The novel illustrated that most people followed Jesus because they were guided by the image and miracles. It was mentioned in the novel how law replaces freedom because it sets boundaries to the actions of people. Apparently, the Grand Inquisitor pointed out that the kind of freedom occurred in most people in following Jesus was brought by their captivated and seduced conscience. The Grand Inquisitor gave charges against the actions of Jesus because he believed that the latter overestimated the humanity of people. In the novel, the Grand inquisitor himself believed that Jesus treated the people differently and he overestimated the nature of mankind. It was mentioned in the novel that mystery, miracle, and authority can conquer and hold the conscience of the people. The Grand Inquisitor gave emphasis on the power of authority demonstrated by Jesus to the people. Jesus displayed a kind of authority with certain force that can unify the people. The novel has intriguing twist and shocking revelation as the Grand Inquisitor rejected the freedom of chosen ones because he himself recognized the weaknesses of the masses of humanity. There are comments in the novel about human nature, love, and freedom. The masses of humanity cannot easily manage the freedom that Jesus once suggested to them (Freedom, 2009). The core of human beings admitted that they cannot handle the absolute freedom and all they want is miracle authority, and mystery. The Grand Inquisitor embodied two perspectives in handling human nature and freedom; he first embraced with the freedom and aimed to become one of the chosen ones. He himself found out that by embracing the freedom isolation he was isolated from human kind. The Grand Inquisitor was convinced that freedom will not respond to in masses and people cannot understand it. To live with absolute freedom is similar with living in an island isolated from humanity.
Conclusion
The Grand Inquisitor considered the human beings as weak masses and not appropriate with the kind of absolute freedom once suggested by Jesus. Freedom and love was offered by Jesus Christ and this fact cannot be captured in creeds but demonstrated in the world. The Grand Inquisitor is not all wrong with his statement, and it seems that he has just failed to appreciate the true transformation of humanity through that acts of love that sets true sense of freedom.
Reference
Dostoevski, Fyodor. “Freedom Comes from True Authority”. Selection 7, p 69. (2009).