15 Oct 2009

Sample Essay: The Joy of Violence

Why Children Need Fantasy, Superheroes and Make-Believe Violence, as well as a former scripter for DC and Marvel Comics, among others. He spoke at the 2006 Montreal International Games Summit, about suppressing aggression, and how video games can act as liberation for such an tagonism.

Cognitive ncoassociation theory says that venting could augment rather than reduce annoyancTopic: Violent video games and school shootings.

The theory of Catharsis says that expelling one’s fury will bring about an optimistic enhancement in one’s mental condition. To justify this statement the violence caused by video games can be studied. It is said that video games have an immense role to play in facilitating the learning process. They have invaded domains even outside the game. Good video games are intricate, exigent, and extensive.  Good games have to slot in good learning principles in virtue of which they get themselves well learned. Game designers build on each other’s successes. Gerard Jones, an American writer, is the sole creator of some marvel comics such as Batman, Spiderman, Pokémon and many more to name.Gerard Jones is the person behind Killing Monsterse and belligerent behaviors. In order to release or vent their anger, people punch pillows, or throw dishes or scream. Legendary comic-book author Gerard Jones argues that bloody videogames, gun-glorifying gangster rap and other forms of ‘creative violence’ facilitate far more children than they damage. He says that the violent video games act as a tool for the kids to master their temper. Video games have been so much under attack recently, that the author portrays his ideas pertaining to the realities that remain veiled behind the issues. Most people in this business are very amusing and non-confrontational and the fact that they are being despised as the root of crime, causes of brutality, is distressing.

Video games have a built in benefit in the conception of incentive for an extended engagement. Human beings feel that their bodies and minds extend, in a rather intimate way, to the area around them over which they have direct control, usually a fairly small area. The space closely around the human body seems to be associated to it in such a technique that one can feel that it is being “invaded” by others. When humans can manipulate something at a distance, for example controlling with a keyboard a far-away robot seen on a screen, they get an uncanny feeling that their minds and bodies have been vastly extended .

The author Jones says that he was put in a petite, experimental school. It seemed the school was not suited for him. He was too scared to associate with his friends in their arrogant hustle into   adolescence. He thus abandoned social life and lived in seclusion. Jones argues that kids triumph over the feelings of powerlessness.. The dual-identity concept at the heart of many superhero stories helps Kids resolve the disagreement between the inner self and the public self as they come off through socialization. Playing a video game could help keeping the mind alert, active and youthful. It leads to the feeling of   maneuvering a character from a distance in a very exploratory manner.. The minds and bodies seem to extend into the virtual world filled with characters. This process appears to permit players to recognize effectively with the virtual character. The player subjugates himself to this world of characters and is powerfully provoked to obligate himself. When students are learning a technical subject in school such as some area of science, this domain could be seen as a special world of its own.

Less people presently believe that enacting stricter gun control laws will tackle the main causes of increased school shooting cases. Previously, whenever a school shooting occurred it was followed by the public calling for tighter gun control laws. But, supporters for tighter gun control in the recent cases of school shootings have become less vocal after realizing that the problem is not just controlling guns. The problem is much more than that. This paper aims at examining if tighter gun laws could reduce cases of school shooting in America.

American’s condolences were poured to the families of Aminish country who lost five girls while five more were in critical condition in Pennsylvania hospitals. No words can express the grief and shock that American feel about this senseless killing. Sadly, this case is not rare in this country where guns can be possessed by anybody. Chapman (2006)  explains that, Charles Roberts aged 32 who shoot these little kids in a note left behind said that he had molesting young relatives since 12 years and felt an urge of doing it again.

After the killing in the Aminish country, all over the country the citizens and the media began to ask the why are guns left to kill children? There is no clear answer to these crimes however, one thing is clear. These crimes could possibly be avoided if it was not easy to obtain guns. Even though stricter gun control laws are likely not to stop a deranged person such as Roberts, who possessed legally purchased guns, this doe not imply that stricter laws would not help. Chapman (2006) argues that congress has a duty and powers to enact laws that can bring sanity to owning a gun. However, the political will required to enact such laws is the one missing. If such cases that happen in Amish country will not make American and the congress to embrace stricter gun control laws then what else needs to happen?

Jaana (p, 36) observes that, America has about 250 million firearms, nearly more than the number of people in the country. However, the laws that are regulating all these guns are slack beyond what one could belief. It is not only possible to obtain many guns it is also possible to get them whenever one wants. Dirk  (p, 10) adds that, it is apparent the slack gun laws in America contributes in a direct way the many incidents of school shooting that  have continued to  witnessed in America. But, these sentiments are not shared by many as it can be sated below.

When the American public was asked to state specific preventive measures for the school violence, majority of them responded by saying that more extra attention need to be given to those students who show anti-social behaviours. In deed, 60% of those who participated in the research believed that giving added attention and taking a close examination of such students will be a more effective manner of curbing school shootings occurrences, while only 6% stated that passing stricter gun rules will prevent school shootings Chapman (2006).

Stricter gun control would not essentially make American schools safer. However when you compare statistics of the number of school shooting cases and those of a country like Denmark or Japan where there is strict gun control laws, having tighter gun control in school appears to be answer. Chapman (2006) argues that culturally, a lot have American prefer to ignore the figures that indicate that tighter gun control laws in America would led in reduced cases of shooting in schools. In theory could possibly adopt a gun control like that in Japan where the only the only group allowed to posses guns are the police, the military and the hunters. However, such an outlaw would be entirely bizarre to Americans, who for more than 300 years have lived in the freer culture when it comes to possessing guns Chapman (2006).

A number of people have argued that the best way of reducing the number of shooting in schools is improving schools discipline and not making the laws stricter. However, disciplining students in schools have its challenges  kin deed some studies indicate that  harsh school disciple may result in the students resorting to guns to shoot teachers whom the students feel this they are punishing them unfairly. Thus what could be intended to reduce school shooting could instead increase the shooting.

However, in a study that was carried out by the journal of Quantitative Criminology revealed that there was no link between gun control regulations and violence crimes. Stricter gun controls have been found not to reduce violet crimes. This finding is also supported by a federal CDC committee that was established in 2003. Similarly another study carried out by the National Academy of Sciences also established the same results: gun control laws do not reduce crimes (Jaana, p, 35).

Glass and Feldhann (2007) explains that, as for the shooting that happened at the VA Tech were Seung-Hue Cho went on a rampage of shooting and killed students and injured others, the problem is was not the easiness of buying a gun but mental illness. And this seems to be the problem in many other cases that happens in many of the school shootings.

Regarding reducing the shooting in schools many parents and experts believe that parental involvement would greatly help. In a study carried out by Gallup poll, majority acknowledged that parental involvement in student’s affairs would help students to be more responsible. Many parents agreed that more guidance and counselling from parents is vital in instilling discipline and reducing shorting in schools.For instance, Glass and Feldhann (2007) quotes a psychologist Dr. Susan Lipkins a specialist on campus violence states that Cho showed obvious symptoms of schizophrenia, and was bound to do something terrible. The superseding issue here is that the mental health system needs to be fixed and not the law.

Lipkins explains that, parents think that schools or universities have got a structure or mechanism to monitor their children (Glass and Feldhann, 2007). However, schools are less funded and have no any integrated ways of flagging distressed students. Teachers were there who attempted to assist Cho; some girls were in fact being stalked By Cho. Yet, no body was there to monitor his increase of alarming behaviors.

Enacting laws to ban guns in any way will be going against the 2nd Amendment since it state that, American people have their right to own firearms and that right should not be infringed upon  (Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).

To own a gun in the U.S the federal law stipulates that:

A person has to be aged 18 or over in order to buy a shotgun or rifle from a dealer who is licensed by the federal government in any state.

A person has to be 21 years or over to obtain a handgun from a seller who has a license to sell arms in a person’s state of residence.

A federal licensed dealer has to document all the information of about the buyer, and all the information of the firearm sold to the buyer, this information includes the serial number of the firearm, the model and date of purchase. The dealer is also required to notify the Federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, in case an individual purchases more than one fire arm within a period of five day.

Supposing the dealer fails to adhere to any of the above laid down requirements, the he is punishable ( Korwin and Attorney, p, 65)

In summing up, stricter gun control laws are not an effective way of reducing shooting in schools. Any gun control law has shown that they do nothing is curbing crimes or saving lives, or making schools safer. People and students who have in the past been involved in schools shooting are normally mental stable and there is little in law that can be done to stop them from doing the heinous acts they did. What needs to be stressed is the social aspect, to try and create give attention to children who seem disturbed and more important to getter a better relationship between the students their parents, the school and the society as whole. However, one can not total dismiss the impact of stricter law on reducing school shooting, probably it can assist but, its impact will be so little. As a criminal was reported to have said “Laws is for the law-abiding, and we aren’t, so they don’t apply to us.”

A video game of their choice would let them to take on distinctiveness as scientists of a certain sort, to see and think about themselves and their taken-for-granted everyday world in new ways. However, many of these principles are much better replicated in good quality video games than they are in today’s schools. The younger mass has to learn complex and challenging things in their academics. With the existing system in our schools to skill-and-drill and curricula driven by standardized tests, good learning principles have, more and more, been left on the cognitive scientist’s laboratory bench and, it is through good video games.

Video game systems are the source for much debate and argumentation in today’s society. They have permitted children to spend time in an interactive way to run off from this world and cross the threshold of their imagination. The creators of the games have only laid the guiding principle. Children, fancy themselves as characters with amazing potential and capacity to do many things.

Critics, nevertheless, agonize that children are not physically capable of accepting that games are not a reality, and, consequently, cannot comprehend, in the real world, one cannot commit the performance they do while playing video games. Violence, for instance, is found in more than half of all video games. Parents just as the author’s parents did, worry that children who continuously view violence in this way will be trained to see violence as a good action.

Numerous chief openings remain in the violent video game literature. One in particular is the lack of studies pertaining to the link between routine violent video game revelation and belligerence. The author says that the adults imbibe into their children, through a countless number of ways that their desire for violence is wrong. Little do the children understand this? Imaginary gun battles and symbolic killings mesmerize them.

At length, it is concluded that video game violence has been a passionately debated topic since the beginnings of the industry. The topic grew from the debate on media violence or violence in print media. Video games, because of their addictive temperament, are said to have more brunt on children. The proponents and opponents of video game expurgation do not actually plunge into customary political limitations.

Reference:

Jones, Gerard. “Violent Video Games are Good.” Mother Jones (2000).

Chapman, Steve: Gun Control Laws Will Not Stop School Shootings: School Shootings. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006, available at: http://find.galegroup.com/ovrc/infomark.do?&

Dirk Johnson: A Bloody Day on the Rez: – A Columbine Copycat Shatters the Calm in Minnesota: Newsweek, April 4, 2005. p, 10

Glass, Diane and Feldhann, Shaunti (2007): Would stricter gun control laws prevent tragedies like the one at VA. Tech? Available online at: www.ajc.com/opinion

Jaana Juvenon: Myths and Facts About Bullying in Schools: – Effective Interventions Depend upon Debunking Long-Held Misconceptions: Behavioral Health Management, 2005.p, 34-37

Korwin, Alan and Attorney Michael (2006): Gun Laws of America (5th, Ed.) Bloomfield Press (Phoenix), p, 65-67

Thomas Schmoll: Masculinity and School Shootings-Gender Public Advocacy Coalition Says Common Thread Is Overlooked in Media Coverage; America’s Intelligence Wire, March 22, 2005, p, 12-13

Bushman Brad, “Does Venting Feed or Extinguish the flame? Carthis, Rumination, Distraction, Anger, and Aggressive Responding “Personality and Psychology Bulletin

Filed under: Sample essays — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 10:46 am
Place Your Order Now
Academic Writing Services:

Business / Professional Writing Services:

Free Essay Tips / Writing Guides:
Tags:
100% Satisfaction Guarantee

We will revise your paper until you are completely satisfied. Moreover, you are free to request a different writer to rewrite your paper entirely, should you be unhappy with the writing style, level of research, communication, etc.

100% Authentic Research & Writing Guarantee

We guarantee that you will receive a fully authentic, 100% non-plagiarized work. Otherwise, we will just give you your money back.

100% Confidentiality & Privacy Guarantee

No one will ever find out that you have used our service. We guarantee that your personal information as well as any other data related to your order(s) will remain confidential to the extent allowed by law. It will not be shared with any third party unless you provide a written consent.